|
KMID : 0357520180410050437
|
|
Journal of Radiological Science and Technology
2018 Volume.41 No. 5 p.437 ~ p.444
|
|
|
Performance Comparison of Bed-type and Stand-type Commercial Whole Body Counter Made by Canberra for Internal Exposure Monitoring
|
|
Kim Bong-Gi
Ha Wi-Ho
Kwon Tae-Eun
Park Min-Seok
Lee Jun-Ho
Kim Jong-Min
Lee Sang-Gyung
Jeong Gyu-Hwan
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
Whole-Body counters have been used to evaluate the internal contamination of gamma emitting radionuclides. Among the whole-body counters used in domestic nuclear facilities, Fastscan made by CANBERRA contains 2 NaI(Tl) detectors and is generally used to monitor the primary internal exposure. It has the advantage of achieving MDA even with short time measurements. Accuscan is a bed type, and has good energy resolution because it is composed of HPGe detector. Since the Accuscan with better energy resolution than Fastscan has better able to identify radionuclides, it is used to monitor secondary internal exposure. Some nuclear facilities have only Fastscan. We analyzed statistically whether Fastscan is enough to ensure accuracy and precision comparing with Accuscan. To do this, we prepared a CRM created by the Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science. We also obtained the data of 6 Fastscans and 5 Accuscans in domestic nuclear facilities. As a result of the study, although Fastscan compared with Accuscan is not as accurate as the Accuscan, the precision is statistically same. However, accuracy of Fastscan is in compliance with international standards except low energy range. In terms of accuracy and precision except radionuclides emitting low energy, it is possible to measure radioactivity inside workers even in nuclear facilities where only Fastscan is used.
|
|
|
KEYWORD
|
|
|
Accuscan, Fastscan, Internal Exposure, Accuracy and Precision, ANSI
|
|
|
FullTexts / Linksout information
|
|
|
|
|
|
Listed journal information
|
|
|